San Onofre Plant Will Cost $4 Billion and take 20 years to Dismantle

Photo Courtesy of Kippreport

In 2012 an inspection of the San Onofre  revealed significant damage to pipes that carried radioactive water in order to cool the reactor. It was then discovered that a failure of the plant’s steam generators led to the leak of a small amount of radioactive waste. Following these unsettling discoveries the plant was closed and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) commissioned a report lead by Robert Budnitz of Berkeley Lawrence National Laboratory to investigate what led to the the failure. The report also compared the upgrade to San Onofre’s generator which occured from 2008-2011 along side  upgrades to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant in San Luis Obispo County which were done a the same time.  The report estimated the total cost of the eventual deactivation of San Onofre at $4 billion

According to yahoo news the reported showed that the plant’s generators were made by different companies, were installed by different teams and that San Onofre’s two generators provided more power than those at Diablo Canyon.

However, the parameters of the CPUC’s report mean further questions could not be answered.

In the report Budnitz wrote: “‘What error(s) led to the tube failure(s)?’ or ‘At what stage were those errors made?’ or ‘Who made those errors?’ or ‘What might have been done, and by whom, and at what stage, to have averted those errors?'”

According to CPUC spokesperson Andrew Kotch, answering these questions has been ruled out because Budnitz’s report “identified no basis to think similar problems existed at the Diablo Canyon facility steam generators.”

According to a report by U-T San Diego dismantling San Onofre could be the most expensive process ever undertaken by the nuclear power industry, since it began 70 years ago.

Southern California Edison announced that the dismantling work will begin in 2016. The company’s chief executive, Ted Craver, said there was enough money to pay for the work. Edison plans to store the twin-reactor plant’s spent nuclear fuel on site, until the US government can provide a permanent storage for the radioactive waste.

8 Comments

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    brown bunny

    Had a friend that was an SCE employee at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) and he basically said the nuclear power plant in the Simpsons cartoon was run better than this place

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    earth matters

    SCE – ’nuff said…

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    wtf

    $4B and 20 years. That’s SCE-efficiency at its finest

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    roper77

    20 years. Guess they’re taking their sweet time to dismantle it just right. Unlike they way they ran it

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    morganti

    at 20 years and 4 billion, it sounds like they figured out a way to dismantle it and get paid by the hour

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    jordanwalker

    they should at least keep the two large teat-like structures intact and create bio-domes or something out of them!

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    wookierock

    the fact that there is virtually nothing positive to say about the construction or operation of this plant nor even the dismantling of it is rather perturbing…

  • Reply September 10, 2014

    soldier2014

    Has anyone ever caught any 3-eyed orange fish in the waters off this place, a la the Simpsons??

Leave a Reply